Featured, From the Wards
comments 4

E-Cigarettes: To Vape Or Not To Vape?


Making news recently are encouraging headlines that the United State’s smoking rate has reached historic lows. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that the percentage of smokers over the age of 18 dropped from 20.9 percent in 2005 to 17.8 percent in 2013. Public health advocates herald these successes, but they also understand that more work needs to be done to decrease high smoking rates among low-income individuals and minorities.

In recent times, electronic cigarettes, or e-cigarettes as they are commonly called, have risen onto the scene. These tobacco-less products still contain addictive nicotine, but instead of producing smoke, they emit an aerosol when the heating element atomizes a liquid solution known as e-liquid. E-liquids usually contain a mixture of propylene glycol, glycerin, nicotine and other various flavorings.

Proponents of e-cigarettes contend that they are safer than traditional cigarettes and help smokers to quit. Public health advocates urge caution regarding e-cigarettes until more data is gathered. They worry that the general public will perceive these tobacco alternatives as risk-free and may prove to be enticing to younger populations.

As medical students, we will encounter scenarios in which patients are seeking advice on the benefits of switching to e-cigarettes, or we may have patients, who were previously non-smokers, start “vaping.” To effectively counsel our patients and advocate for their health and well-being, we must stay current with the evolving research on e-cigarette use.

First, let us examine the current data that supports the notion that e-cigarettes may promote tobacco smoking cessation. Recent research done by UK and New Zealand researchers and also reviewed by the Cochrane Collaboration looked at the effects of e-cigarettes on both cessation rates and the number of people reducing cigarette use by at least 50 percent. The research found that 9 percent of e-cigarette users were able to quit as opposed to 4 percent who used a placebo. Similarly, 36 percent of participants who used e-cigarettes were able to curb cigarette use in half while only 28 percent of placebo users were able to do this. Though these results show promise that e-cigarettes may have some efficacy to combat the complex problem of addiction, researchers stress that further studies need to be conducted.

A contentious area of debate revolves around proponents’ assertions that e-cigarettes are a safe alternative to traditional tobacco cigarettes. While e-cigarettes may contain fewer harmful chemicals than their traditional counterparts, emerging research is showing that these sleek new products can still cause harm. A recent review in the journal Circulation found that e-cigarettes deliver high levels of nanoparticles, which can trigger inflammation and also have been linked to asthma, stroke, heart disease and diabetes. Furthermore, research has shown that heating of solvents found in e-liquid can produce formaldehyde levels similar to those found in tobacco smoke. E-cigarettes clearly pose some level of risk to its users and possibly to non-users through secondhand vapor, but it will be some time before studies can elucidate the long-term risks involved.

Public health advocates’ biggest fears regarding e-cigarettes is that they will be an attractive, new option for children and teenagers. They worry that e-cigarette use among this population will be a gateway to traditional tobacco cigarettes. Current research suggests that their fears are warranted. A study from the 2011-2013 National Youth Tobacco Survey demonstrated that the number of teenagers in middle and high school who tried e-cigarettes, despite never using traditional cigarettes, increased from 79,000 in 2011 to 263,000 in 2013. Of graver concern is that nearly half of those kids surveyed say they plan to smoke regular cigarettes within a year. Due to this finding, many are urging the Food and Drug Administration to introduce stringent guidelines to regulate the e-cigarette industry.

As medical students and future doctors, it is vitally important to stay current with the latest research and recommendations. Our scientific knowledge base continues to grow exponentially and whether it is e-cigarettes or the latest diet trend, our patients will turn to us as a trusted source of advice and counsel. Though e-cigarettes might be an effective smoking cessation tool for some patients, they are not a harmless alternative. Knowing this information will allow us to effectively partner with our patients to help them make healthy lifestyle decisions.

Jeffrey Mahlum Jeffrey Mahlum (2 Posts)

Contributing Writer

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

My name is Jeff Mahlum, and I am a contributing writer for in-Training magazine. I am a Class of 2018 medical student at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. I also completed my undergraduate degree in Biology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. I took a year off between undergraduate studies and medical school to complete a graduate certificate in Patient Health Advocacy. As someone with a physical disability, I have a particular interest in health disparities and access to care for patients with disabilities.

  • FergusReturns

    “Current research suggests that their fears (of a gateway effect) are warranted.”

    No. It absolutely does not. If those fears – which have no basis in logic – were warranted, we’d expect to see smoking rates rise along with e-cig use. Instead smoking rates are at a record low. The same “gateway” fears were trumpeted about Swedish snus and spectacularly failed to materialise – smoking now has one of the lowest smoking rates in the developed world.

  • FergusReturns

    “research has shown that heating of solvents found in e-liquid can produce formaldehyde levels similar to those found in tobacco smoke.”

    Only if you crank the power up so high you burn the atomiser. When used at realistic power outputs e-cigs have been found – by exactly the same study you link to – to produce no formaldehyde at all. Are you being dishonest here, or were you just too incompetent to read the actual study before mouthing off?

  • FergusReturns

    “nearly half of those kids surveyed say they plan to smoke regular cigarettes within a year.”

    No, that’s a lie. I’ll be fair and point out that the lie in this case comes from the CDC, not you; they counted those who said they “probably wouldn’t” smoke a cigarette in the next year as “intends to smoke”. Of course if you’d done any research you’d know that…

  • FergusReturns

    “e-cigarettes deliver high levels of nanoparticles, which can trigger inflammation and also have been linked to asthma, stroke, heart disease and diabetes.”

    The nanoparticles linked to inflammation, asthma, stroke etc etc etc are solid particles of combustion products found in cigarette smoke and vehicle exhaust emissions. E-cig vapour contains none of these combustion products. None as in zero. Did you know that the author of the study you lifted that information from is an aeronautical engineering graduate who has no medical or scientific qualifications at all?